docs(agentos): mark completed projection follow-up slots#1136
Conversation
|
Re-review requested for current head What changed after the first push:
Validation:
Please re-run any Ouroboros/design-note/warden review against this head. |
Merge-readiness assessment for PR #1136This PR is merge-ready from the AgentOS roadmap/SSOT perspective. What this PR changesPR #1136 is a narrow docs-only correction to The current head (
Alignment with #961 / AgentOS SSOTThis matches the direction established by #961 because it reduces scheduling ambiguity without changing AgentOS semantics. The PR does not introduce a new roadmap authority, projection schema, evidence model, runtime behavior, cache, exporter, or execution/resume authority. It keeps Over-engineering / design risk reviewI do not see over-engineering here. The change is deliberately small: one docs file, 8 additions and 3 deletions. It fixes stale/ambiguous status labels that previously made completed and still-open follow-up slots look equivalent. That is exactly the kind of minimal roadmap hygiene needed to prevent duplicate worker dispatches and misread Wave 1 sequencing. The follow-up commit also removed the only ambiguity I found during review: the Mechanical-evaluation fixture row previously said Validation
VerdictAPPROVE / merge-ready. The PR is a bounded docs-only correction aligned with #961 and the AgentOS SSOT direction, with no blocking design, implementation, or test concerns. |
PR review analysisVerdict: APPROVE Scope reviewed
FindingsBlocking issuesNone. Major issuesNone. Minor issuesNone. NitsNone. Review rationaleThe current diff is a minimal documentation correction that improves the projection follow-up queue without expanding scope. It keeps The Mechanical-evaluation fixture row is now correctly bounded: PR #1132 remains open until merged, the fixture is offline/local/read-model-only, EventStore remains the source of truth, and no new AgentOS surface is created. This resolves the previous internal inconsistency between "open PR #1132" and wording that implied the slot had already landed. Because this PR changes documentation only, it does not affect runtime behavior, persistence semantics, projection authority, evidence/verifier policy, plugin permissions, HITL resume behavior, Workflow IR dispatch, or exporter/caching behavior. The anti-actions and review checklist remain intact. Validation reviewed
Final recommendationAPPROVE. This PR is safe to merge as a docs-only AgentOS roadmap hygiene fix. |
|
@ouroboros-agent re-review |
|
Re review ping |
|
Re review ping |
Q00
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Roadmap-gate check: this docs-only PR is aligned with #961 / #946 as a status correction for projection follow-up slots. It does not advance gated Tier 2+ implementation, does not reopen the closed agentos-substrate-wiring milestone, and does not stale the canonical SSOT. No warden gate block.
Posted by agentos-roadmap-warden — bot. Reply with /warden ignore to suppress further comments on this thread.
|
@ouroboros-agent re-review current head This is a no-op retrigger commit after the latest bounded AgentOS/#961 audit. Please check PR #1136 against the AgentOS SSOT, design-note concerns, and roadmap/warden gate:
Local/Codex audit found no changes needed; please emit the current-head design-note / approval verdict if clean. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review — ouroboros-agent[bot]
Verdict: APPROVE
Reviewing commit
ea6e14dfor PR #1136
Review record:
7b172738-6a4c-4b93-b611-8a520925f23c
Blocking Findings
No in-scope blocking findings remained after policy filtering.
Non-blocking Suggestions
None.
Design Notes
Unable to assess architecture or changed behavior because the local source snapshot and patch could not be read in this environment.
Policy Notes
- Omitted 1 finding(s) that referenced files outside the current PR changed-files scope.
Recovery Notes
First recoverable review artifact generated from codex analysis log.
Reviewed by ouroboros-agent[bot] via Codex deep analysis
Merge-readiness assessment for PR #1136I re-reviewed PR #1136 against the current head What this PR changesThis is a narrow docs-only correction to
AgentOS / #961 alignmentThis PR is aligned with the AgentOS roadmap direction in #961. It reduces scheduling ambiguity in a non-authoritative queue companion, while preserving the canonical authority of #961 and the #946 projection lane. It does not introduce a new AgentOS surface, projection schema, evidence/verifier policy, cache, exporter behavior, runtime behavior, resume authority, or planning/dispatch authority. Over-engineering / implementation directionI do not see over-engineering or an odd implementation direction. The effective code review scope is one Markdown file with 8 additions and 3 deletions. The change fixes stale roadmap/status labels that could otherwise cause already-shipped work (#1061/#1064) to be scheduled again. The #1132 row is also bounded correctly as an offline/local read-model fixture until that PR merges. Bot / design-note status
Validation
RecommendationMerge-ready. This PR is a minimal roadmap hygiene correction, has current-head bot approval, has green checks, and preserves the AgentOS SSOT boundaries needed for safe sequencing. |
PR Review SummaryVerdictApprove Scope Reviewed
Blocking IssuesNone. WarningsNone. Mutation-Test Thinking
Complexity / CRAP-style Risk
Test Quality Assessment (6/7)
Security / Operational RiskNone. The PR does not touch runtime behavior, persistence, evidence policy, plugin permissions, HITL resume authority, Workflow IR dispatch, exporters, caching, secrets, or provider payload handling. Looks Good
Final RecommendationApprove / merge-ready. The PR is a minimal, well-bounded documentation hygiene update that reduces roadmap scheduling ambiguity without changing AgentOS semantics or creating a second SSOT. |
Summary
Updates
docs/agentos/projection-followups.mdso the "Next safe PR slots" table reflects which slots have already shipped vs. which remain open. The Wave 1 plan in #1131 treated this table as a list of "next safe slots" to schedule, but it actually lists eligible slots regardless of implementation state — so #1061 (Artifact/Verdict populator) and #1064 (Status JSON CLI) were planned again even though they had already shipped.Refs #1131, #946 (parent: #946).
Changes
Out of scope
Test plan
git diff --check -- docs/agentos/projection-followups.mdf5732096fb80a00db001fa679484add848868b43: Ruff Lint, MyPy Type Check, Bridge TypeScript, Python 3.12/3.13/3.14 tests,enforce-envelope, andenforce-boundaryall passed.