docs: Remove leading "sphinx-build" from buildArguments setting

[renato-pipkin]

cd0d7c9 introduced the setting buildArguments(part of #1067). Thus,

buildCommand = ["sphinx-build", "-M", "html", "docs", "${defaultBuildDir}", "--nitpicky", "--verbose"]

became

buildArguments = ["sphinx-build", "-M", "html", "docs", "${defaultBuildDir}", "--nitpicky", "--verbose"]

Note however, that the values of this setting are not arguments but a command.
To me the following would be more correct:

buildArguments = ["-M", "html", "docs", "${defaultBuildDir}", "--nitpicky", "--verbose"]

Note the missing program sphinx-build in the first position, i.e. all the values are arguments.

Luckily, Esbonio already treats it that way:

esbonio/lib/esbonio/esbonio/sphinx_agent/config.py

Lines 79 to 96 in 7d14993

	@classmethod
	def fromcli(cls, args: list[str]):
	"""Return the ``SphinxConfig`` instance that's equivalent to the given arguments.
	Parameters
	----------
	args
	The cli arguments you would normally pass to ``sphinx-build``
	Returns
	-------
	Optional[SphinxConfig]
	``None`` if the arguments could not be parsed, otherwise the set configuration
	options derived from the sphinx build command.
	"""
	if args[0] == "sphinx-build":
	args = args[1:]

(at least I believe that is the location where the option is used and a potential leading sphinx-build is stripped)

The test suite also seems to cover this use case:

esbonio/lib/esbonio/tests/server/features/test_sphinx_config.py

Lines 449 to 471 in 7d14993

	@pytest.mark.parametrize(
	"value, expected",
	[
	({}, SphinxConfig()),
	(
	{"pythonCommand": ["/bin/python"]},
	SphinxConfig(python_command=SubProcess(["/bin/python"])),
	),
	(
	{"pythonCommand": {"command": ["/bin/python"]}},
	SphinxConfig(python_command=SubProcess(["/bin/python"])),
	),
	(
	{"buildCommand": ["-M", "html", "src", "dest"]},
	SphinxConfig(build_command=["-M", "html", "src", "dest"]),
	),
	(
	{"buildArguments": ["-M", "html", "src", "dest"]},
	SphinxConfig(build_command=["-M", "html", "src", "dest"]),
	),
	],
	)
	def test_structure_config(value: dict[str, Any], expected: SphinxConfig):

and

https://github.com/swyddfa/esbonio/blob/7d14993a594204371c0c66f90f44ab17f1639c04/lib/esbonio/tests/sphinx-agent/test_sa_unit.py

This pull request, updates the documentation, to reflect that buildArguments are only arguments and buildCommand is the full command (not changed in this PR).

---

Sidenote:
I noticed there are these two folders:

• lib/esbonio/tests/server/feature
• lib/esbonio/tests/server/features

should these be the same?

[alcarney]

Thank you!

I agree, now that we have buildArguments it's clearer to drop the sphinx-build part.

---

Sidenote:
I noticed there are these two folders ... should these be the same?

No they should be separate... though it's probably another poor naming choice on my part! 😅

The esbonio server is composed of multiple LanguageFeatures and there is a thin framework that sits on top of pygls to support aggregating response data from multiple features. The (admittedly few!) unit tests for that framework are in tests/server/feature

Unit tests for specific feature implementations, say converting rst directives to completion items live in tests/server/features/

[renato-pipkin]

Sidenote:
I noticed there are these two folders ... should these be the same?

No they should be separate [...]

Ok, thanks for explaining and merging!