Use neutral phrasing in README - #360
Conversation
|
This and prior PRs address user-facing documentation, but many uses of the non-neutral phrases still exist in internal documentation and code comments. If we're open to removing these, I'll open a separate PR to do that. I think it's a good idea because it keeps the entire codebase, public or otherwise, aligned on the same phrasing. One exception is when referring specifically to APIs like |
|
@broken-circle could you rebase? I'm not sure why the jobs are not running... |
c4b055c to
0fa12bd
Compare
|
@iCharlesHu Sure thing. Something seemed to be wrong with GitHub Actions late last week, since it didn't run here or on a few other PRs I updated, but looks like it's working now! |
|
(thank you @broken-circle - I didn't see the ping to review until after it was merged, but it looks great!) |
#328 made wording changes to use more neutral phrasing:
I noticed some of these phrases were still present in the README.
cc @heckj