[DRAFT] GVN: Only propagate borrows from SSA-locals

[dianqk]

This is a more principled fix than #147886.
If using a reference at a new location is UB, the reference is not an SSA local borrow. We should only propagate borrows from SSA locals in the SSA-based GVN.

Not ready for reviewing. I haven't resolved all non-SSA borrows.

r? ghost

[dianqk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f23e5de (f23e5de34a174f8bd281d69038b68bf6332b1af6, parent: fcd630976c460c819c4bbcaf107d0c94501205d8)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f23e5de): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.9%]	20
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.1%, 2.0%]	27
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.2%, -0.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.2%, 0.9%]	24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.1%, secondary -4.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[1.9%, 2.8%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-6.8%, -0.6%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.7%	[-6.5%, -3.7%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-6.8%, 2.8%]	5

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.0%, 6.9%]	11
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	14
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-1.0%, -0.0%]	27
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.0%, 6.9%]	38

Bootstrap: 475.254s -> 472.456s (-0.59%)
Artifact size: 390.85 MiB -> 390.82 MiB (-0.01%)

[dianqk]

@bors try parent=fcd630976c460c819c4bbcaf107d0c94501205d8 @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 2183340 (218334063dc5d70b7f9d69202bf22750167c6cbf, parent: fcd630976c460c819c4bbcaf107d0c94501205d8)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (2183340): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.9%]	17
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.8%]	23
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.2%, -0.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.2%, 0.9%]	21

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.0%	[-4.6%, -0.6%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-4.6%, 1.7%]	4

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.0%, 6.9%]	11
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	14
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.9%, -0.0%]	11
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-0.9%, 6.9%]	22

Bootstrap: 475.254s -> 472.783s (-0.52%)
Artifact size: 390.85 MiB -> 390.84 MiB (-0.00%)