Skip to content

Conversation

@david-luna
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

#5765 was close to be completed but it became inactive. This PR takes the original branch and applies the suggestion of moving the validation to the logs SDK package. ref: #5765 (comment)

Fixes #5744

Short description of the changes

same as #5765

@david-luna david-luna requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2025 09:02
@david-luna david-luna changed the title Any value for logs and circular refs fix(api-logs,sdk-logs): allow AnyValue attributes for logs and handle circular references. take 2 Dec 11, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.45%. Comparing base (a36e8e9) to head (9fb09e7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6210      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.43%   95.45%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         317      318       +1     
  Lines        9521     9544      +23     
  Branches     2197     2201       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         9086     9110      +24     
+ Misses        435      434       -1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...xperimental/packages/sdk-logs/src/LogRecordImpl.ts 99.12% <100.00%> (+0.86%) ⬆️
...rimental/packages/sdk-logs/src/utils/validation.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[sdk-logs, exporters] investigate if circular refrences are a problem during log record serialization

3 participants