Skip to content

docs: fix 'on the air' to 'over the air' in FORWARD-SECRECY.md #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
lunar-me wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

docs: fix 'on the air' to 'over the air' in FORWARD-SECRECY.md #91

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/FORWARD-SECRECY.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Wire layout of sealed payloads is unchanged (relays still cannot tell modes apar

## Trial-decrypt cost

Every sealed envelope on the air is tried against every agreement secret we hold (opacity: no prekey-id hint). With the ceiling above, worst case is ~28 X25519 ops + AEAD fails per envelope before the long-term try — see the `trial-open cost` unit test for a host-side measurement. A flooder can still amplify this into battery drain; ingress budgets remain a separate hardening track.
Every sealed envelope over the air is tried against every agreement secret we hold (opacity: no prekey-id hint). With the ceiling above, worst case is ~28 X25519 ops + AEAD fails per envelope before the long-term try — see the `trial-open cost` unit test for a host-side measurement. A flooder can still amplify this into battery drain; ingress budgets remain a separate hardening track.

## Tests

Expand Down