Skip to content

Skip pseudo-terminal ioctl test on Nanvix - #913

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
tests/nskip-059-pty-ioctl
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
tests/nskip-059-pty-ioctl

Conversation

@ada-x64

@ada-x64 ada-x64 commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Skip test_ioctl_signed_unsigned_code_param on Nanvix because it requires a pseudo-terminal pair.

Nanvix supports /dev/tty and the other ioctl tests pass, but it does not provide openpty() or legacy /dev/ptyXY devices. CPython's pure-Python pty module imports successfully and only reports the missing capability when pty.openpty() is called.

Tracks #912.

Testing

  • test_ioctl passes against Nanvix v0.24.30 with only the PTY-dependent test skipped.
  • Linux full lifecycle passes.
  • CPython lint passes.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 15, 2026 16:37

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The unsupported Nanvix PTY test is explicitly skipped while other ioctl tests remain covered.

Pull request overview

Skips the pseudo-terminal-dependent ioctl test on Nanvix, where PTY pairs are unavailable.

Changes:

  • Adds a Nanvix-specific skip.
  • Retains the remaining ioctl coverage.
File summaries
File Description
Lib/test/test_ioctl.py Skips the unsupported PTY ioctl test on Nanvix.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@ada-x64
ada-x64 marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2026 16:57
@ppenna
ppenna merged commit ae0e18c into nanvix/v3.12.3 Sep 15, 2026
14 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the tests/nskip-059-pty-ioctl branch September 15, 2026 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants