Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK - #887

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.23.38-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 15, 2026 13:36

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nanvix integration metadata in CPython to use a newer, verified Nanvix SDK release, keeping the manifest and generated lockfile in sync with the intended toolchain image/digest.

Changes:

  • Bump nanvix-version from 0.23.34 to 0.23.38 in the Nanvix manifest.
  • Bump sdk-version to v0.23.38-sdk.1 and update the pinned SDK image digest.
  • Regenerate .nanvix/nanvix.lock to reflect the new SDK/sysroot commit, asset URLs/IDs, and dependency release metadata.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.nanvix/nanvix.toml Updates the Nanvix SDK/toolchain version and pins the new SDK image digest.
.nanvix/nanvix.lock Regenerated lockfile aligning metadata, sysroot commit, and dependency release references with the updated SDK.

Review details

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit 47867ca into nanvix/v3.12.3 Aug 15, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch August 15, 2026 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants