Fix retry logic in UFS device detection APIs

[NishanthSanjeevi]

Description

Fix the retry logic in the UFS device detection APIs

• Impacts functionality?
• Impacts security?
• Breaking change?
• Includes tests?
• Includes documentation?

How This Was Tested

Tested on physical Hardware

Integration Instructions

N/A

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release/202502@ba9f76c). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             release/202502    #1577   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?    1.55%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?      637           
  Lines                     ?   234397           
  Branches                  ?      370           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     3649           
  Misses                    ?   230735           
  Partials                  ?       13           

Flag	Coverage Δ
MdeModulePkg	1.55% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[makubacki]

It would be preferable to have more granular error codes, but looking through the UFS code, they're all mixed up, so this seems reasonable.

[makubacki]

Also, please create a PR in edk2 (without the MU_CHANGE tags). We don't need to wait on it to merge this.

[makubacki]

@NishanthSanjeevi, please push the uncrustify update when you get a chance. I've set automerge so it will merge when that's done.

[mu-automation]

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

[makubacki]

@NishanthSanjeevi, how would you like to proceed with this PR?

[NishanthSanjeevi]

@NishanthSanjeevi, how would you like to proceed with this PR?

Hi MIchael,
We can check-in the PR if there are no further comments