SCEst: Allow host types in SLIC compilation#143
Open
lken274 wants to merge 3 commits intokieler:masterfrom
Open
SCEst: Allow host types in SLIC compilation#143lken274 wants to merge 3 commits intokieler:masterfrom
lken274 wants to merge 3 commits intokieler:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pre() syntax bugfix:
Calling pre() on an IO signal would translate the pre-variable assignment in tick() as:
d->_pA = d->_A;, when it should bed->_pA = d->A;Allow Host types:
Previously, host types would not be compiled correctly. There was a TODO message saying "SCL doesn't allow anything else then the predefined types", which I think is no longer the case. I would like to use host types, hence, I have done some minimal edits which I hope are correct.
Example working snippet:
Unlike in classic Esterel, I do not think the forward type declaration is actually used here (which is reasonable), but it is syntactically valid.