Fix for out of order buffers when re-opening#165
Open
lexman098 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
added 2 commits
May 16, 2025 22:51
Author
|
Actually I think this is a duplicate of #127 Should have looked at other PRs first |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, if I close (:q) a buffer and then re-open the same file later (:e) after opening other files, vim would remember the buffer number but minibufexp would still put the buffer on the end creating unexpected jumps when using :bn or :bp etc. Numbering was also out of order of course. This seems to fix it.