Repository navigation
Conversation
Jev reviewNeeds maintainer review
Each entry is reviewed independently. GitHub merges the whole PR: resolve, remove, or split unresolved entries before merging. shimo4228/jev-research-pipelineJev reviewNeeds maintainer review GitHub listing (not a review criterion): 4 stars · author shimo4228 · 63 followers Suggested category: applications · category confidence: 0.43
Follow-up:
Evidence inspected:
PR commit: Model judgments use Jev only; this comment is generated from a template. Probabilities are model judgments, not verified accuracy. A maintainer decides whether to merge. shimo4228/jev-skill-routerJev reviewNeeds maintainer review GitHub listing (not a review criterion): 12 stars · author shimo4228 · 63 followers Suggested category: integration · category confidence: 0.80
Follow-up:
Evidence inspected: PR commit: Model judgments use Jev only; this comment is generated from a template. Probabilities are model judgments, not verified accuracy. A maintainer decides whether to merge. PR commit: Model judgments use Jev only; this comment is generated from a template. Probabilities are model judgments, not verified accuracy. A maintainer decides whether to merge. |
…e at question screening
fatwang2
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maintainer review of fd48c4b: both entries approved.
For jev-skill-router I inspected shimo4228/jev-skill-router@7300005: the TypeSafe /v1/systemone client, Choice/Noul routing, UserPromptSubmit hook, and decision-log path support the description. integration fits, and README setup/credentials and the MIT license are available. The entry makes no unsupported claim that routing improves outcomes.
For jev-research-pipeline I inspected shimo4228/jev-research-pipeline@6a53b9f beyond the automated file budget: the TypeSafeModel/Provider client, source triage and question-screening judgments, fetch/screen orchestration, daily runner and separate prose Writer support the description. search fits its central purpose of finding and screening new research against open questions; I manually resolve the model's low-confidence applications suggestion. README setup/scheduling and the MIT license are available.
Catalog checks and the Jev review workflow passed. Each entry and the complete batch pass local validation and README generation; the combined catalog passes all four tests. No unresolved entry remains in this batch.
Projects
Jev integration evidence (optional)
scripts/jev_client.py,scripts/router.pysrc/jev_research_pipeline/jev/question_screening.py(per-question judgment),src/jev_research_pipeline/jev/relevance_triage.pyAffiliation
I'm the author and maintainer of both projects.
Checklist
npm run check, or need a maintainer's help.