Skip to content

docs(readme): drop Conventional Commits badge across all languages#88

Merged
danielPoloWork merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/drop-conventional-commits-badge
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

docs(readme): drop Conventional Commits badge across all languages#88
danielPoloWork merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/drop-conventional-commits-badge

Conversation

@danielPoloWork

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Removes the static Conventional Commits badge from the badge row in every README (EN source + ja + zh-Hans).

Why

Follow-up to #87. That PR added the Downloads badge and was intended to also drop this one, but it merged before the removal commit was pushed — so the removal was stranded. This PR lands it on the updated main.

The Conventional Commits badge was a static, unverified claim: the convention is documented in CONTRIBUTING.md and encoded as policy in git.yaml, but it is not CI-enforced (no commitlint job). It targeted a contributor concern in a row aimed at adopters; trimming it keeps the distinctive grounding: labeled, never fabricated badge prominent.

Resulting row

CI · Downloads · License · Python 3.12+ · status: pre-1.0 · grounding

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Remove the static Conventional Commits badge from the badge block in the
EN source README and both translations (ja, zh-Hans). The convention is
already documented (CONTRIBUTING.md) and encoded as policy in git.yaml;
it is not CI-enforced, so the badge asserted an unverified, contributor-
facing claim in a row aimed at adopters. Trims the row and keeps the
distinctive grounding badge prominent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@danielPoloWork danielPoloWork added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 5, 2026
@danielPoloWork danielPoloWork self-assigned this Jul 5, 2026
@danielPoloWork danielPoloWork marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2026 08:28
@danielPoloWork danielPoloWork merged commit 6df886b into main Jul 5, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant