Point the observer comments at the doc's current name - #228
Open
monthop-gmail wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Four comments in overseer.ts cite observers-implementation-plan.md, but that file is checked in as docs/observers.md, so following the reference finds nothing. Retarget them, matching how blueprint-archive.ts cites docs/blueprints.md. Every cited section still exists under the new name: §3 "Concepts & terminology", and §5 "Step 3", "Step 5" and "Step 6". Comments only; no code changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
3 tasks
Author
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this change?
Four comments in
overseer.tsciteobservers-implementation-plan.md, but the file is checked in asdocs/observers.md— so following the reference finds nothing. I hit this while readingensureObserver()and went looking for a file that isn't there.Retargeted all four, matching how
blueprint-archive.tsalready citesdocs/blueprints.md:docs/observers.md§3docs/observers.md§5 Step 5docs/observers.md§5 Step 6docs/observers.md§5 Step 3Why is this obviously correct and trivially verifiable?
The patch is four comment lines; no code changes, so behaviour cannot move.
Both halves are checkable from the tree alone:
docs/observers.mdexists andobservers-implementation-plan.mddoes not.## 3. Concepts & terminology,### Step 3,### Step 5,### Step 6— so each reference resolves to the passage it was always pointing at.Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code