Repository navigation
Stabilize Nacos retry timing assertion - #272
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. 🧰 Additional context used📚 Code guidelines (1)No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe test fixture now records use timestamps with ChangesRetry timing test updates
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This test-only change makes retry timing checks less sensitive to small timer variations while still checking both configured retry delays. No concrete merge-blocking risk remains. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟢 Approval recommended
The focused test-only changes correctly address timer-boundary flakiness.
Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None
What changed in this PR
Stabilizes the Nacos retry timing test without affecting runtime behavior.
Changes:
- Uses monotonic
Stopwatchtimestamps. - Adds a 10 ms tolerance while preserving backoff detection.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
NacosRouterIntegrationTests.cs |
Updates retry timing assertions. |
FakeNacosRouterMcpTools.cs |
Records monotonic timestamps. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Summary
Context
Merged-main CI run 36889089486 repeated a boundary flake previously seen on main: DynamicSlot_UseToolFailureRetries_ThenFallsBack reported a value that formatted as 100 ms but was fractionally below the exact 100 ms threshold.
Validation
Summary by CodeRabbit