Skip to content

DEVDOCS-6721 - Resolving authorization issue with the GetQuoteInfoB2B GraphQL Query #1276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
bc-Vince wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

DEVDOCS-6721 - Resolving authorization issue with the GetQuoteInfoB2B GraphQL Query #1276

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9482920
DEVDOCS-6721 - Resolving authorization issue with the GetQuoteInfoB2B…
bc-Vince Mar 5, 2026
712a505
Apply suggestions from code review
bc-Vince Apr 2, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions docs/b2b-edition/specs/storefront/storefront/rfq.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -401,6 +401,13 @@ paths:
type: integer
example: "1745872023"
description: "The [Unix timestamp](https://www.unixtimestamp.com/) for when the sales quote was created."
- name: uuid
in: query
required: true
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bc-keelan bc-keelan Mar 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[info]
I think it makes sense to show this as required, but for quotes created before the flag is enabled, it is technically not required as these quotes won't have UUIDs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bc-akshatkaushik bc-akshatkaushik Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[suggestion]

To Keelan's point, perhaps worth specifying this in the description 🤔
Otherwise Developers will find it odd to expect this as a required field but having nothing to pass in for old quotes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bc-Vince bc-Vince Apr 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bc-akshatkaushik @bc-keelan I have added a callout to the description of this field.

schema:
type: string
example: "3f7a9c0e-6d21-4f5c-b8a1-2e9d4c7b1a63"
description: "The quote's secondary alphanumeric identifier. This field is only required if the quote has an existing value. Sales quotes created before April 15, 2026 do not have a `uuid` value by default."
responses:
"200":
description: OK
Expand Down
Loading