MAP Framework

Plan-then-build AI coding for Claude Code & Codex CLI. /map-plan decomposes your task into small, reviewable subtasks you approve before any code is written; /map-efficient implements the approved plan, subtask by subtask. The AI still writes the code — you keep the architecture, scope, and review.

The MAP loop

Most AI agents rush straight to code before they understand the task — so you get fast wrong answers and silent rework. MAP inserts a plan you approve first, then implements it in reviewable steps:

idea  ->  prompt  ->  code  ->  hope                      # without MAP
SPEC  ->  PLAN  ->  TEST  ->  CODE  ->  REVIEW  ->  LEARN  # with MAP

You drive the whole loop with two core commands plus three gates:

/map-plan  "add rate limiting to the public API"   # 1. PLAN  — decompose the task; you approve before any code
/map-efficient                                      # 2. BUILD — implement the approved plan, subtask by subtask
/map-check                                          # 3. CHECK — quality gates against the plan
/map-review                                         # 4. REVIEW — semantic review vs spec, tests, and diff
/map-learn                                          # 5. LEARN — save the gotchas for next session

• Start with /map-plan for anything non-trivial — it clarifies behavior and splits the work into contract-sized subtasks.
• Already scoped? Go straight to /map-efficient.
• Tiny edit? /map-plan off-ramps you to a direct edit or /map-fast instead of forcing full planning.

Codex CLI users invoke the same skills with $: $map-plan, $map-efficient, $map-check. See the Usage Guide.

Quick Start

1. Install

uv tool install mapify-cli

# or with pip
pip install mapify-cli

2. Initialize your project

Claude Code is the default provider:

cd your-project
mapify init
claude

Codex CLI is also supported:

cd your-project
mapify init . --provider codex
codex

Then enable the Codex hook manually: run /hooks, select PreToolUse, press t to toggle it on, then press Esc. If your Codex version does not support the hooks feature key yet, start it with codex --enable codex_hooks or upgrade Codex first (upgrading is recommended).

3. Run the loop

/map-plan      define the behavior and split the task
/map-efficient implement the approved plan
/map-check
/map-review
/map-learn

That's the whole golden path. Everything below explains why it works and when to reach for it.

Why MAP Exists

Ad-hoc prompting feels fast on simple tasks. On complex systems it creates a different problem: code appears quickly, but the engineering process disappears.

Common failure modes:

• AI silently makes architecture decisions you did not approve.
• One prompt produces a large diff that is hard to review.
• Tests are written around the generated implementation, including its mistakes.
• The output compiles, but you cannot explain why the design is correct.
• The next session forgets the gotchas you already paid to discover.

MAP moves engineering judgment earlier: write down the behavior, split the work into small contracts, verify each stage, review against the spec, and save lessons for the next run.

When To Use MAP

Good fits	Poor fits
Complex backend features	Typos and tiny edits
Kubernetes controllers and operators	Small one-off scripts
Internal platform tooling	Product ideas where the desired behavior is still unknown
API, CRD, or domain-model changes with invariants	Broad rewrites without clear boundaries
Refactoring with a meaningful test harness	Tasks cheaper to do directly than to plan

What Success Looks Like

After a good first workflow, you should see:

• a written plan or spec before implementation starts;
• small implementation contracts instead of one giant AI diff;
• verification and review artifacts under .map/<branch>/;
• review comments focused on correctness and semantics, not formatting noise;
• /map-learn preserving project rules, gotchas, and handoffs for future sessions.

MAP review is useful, but it is not a replacement for engineering judgment. Serious changes still need human review. The goal is to make that review smaller, earlier, and better grounded.

Case Study: 90 days → 7 days

The DevOpsConf 2026 case study applies this process to a production Kubernetes Project Operator, not a toy CRUD app:

• human estimate: 90 days;
• MAP-style delivery: 7 days;
• workflow: SPEC -> PLAN -> TEST -> CODE -> REVIEW -> LEARN;
• small reviewable PRs instead of one giant generated diff;
• tests before implementation for critical pieces;
• semantic bugs caught in review before merge.

DevOpsConf 2026 case study ->

Core Commands

Command	Use For
/map-plan	Start here for non-trivial work; clarify behavior and decompose tasks
/map-efficient	Implement an approved plan or already-scoped task
/map-fast	Small, low-risk changes where full planning would be overhead
/map-check	Quality gates, verification, and artifact checks
/map-review	Pre-commit semantic review against the plan, tests, and diff
/map-learn	Capture project memory and reusable lessons
/map-debug	Bug fixes and debugging
/map-task	Execute a single subtask from an existing plan
/map-tdd	Test-first implementation workflow
/map-release	Package release workflow
/map-resume	Resume interrupted workflows

Detailed usage and options ->

Canonical MAP flows:

• Standard: /map-plan -> /map-efficient -> /map-check -> /map-review -> /map-learn
• Full TDD: /map-plan -> /map-tdd -> /map-check -> /map-review -> /map-learn
• Targeted subtask TDD: /map-plan -> /map-tdd ST-001 -> /map-task ST-001 -> ... -> /map-check -> /map-review -> /map-learn

These flows maintain branch-scoped artifacts under .map/<branch>/ — blueprint.json (subtask size/concern contracts), code-review-001.md, verification-summary.md, pr-draft.md, run dossiers, and more — so research, review lineage, and verification survive context resets.

Why Engineers Stick With It

• Daily-driver speed — optimized for repeated use, not occasional demo workflows. Structured enough to prevent chaos, lightweight enough to keep token and time cost under control.
• Reviewable diffs — /map-plan and /map-efficient require per-subtask size, concern, and constraint metadata, then validate blueprint.json before implementation, so oversized or mixed-concern plans fail early instead of surprising reviewers later.
• Gates that check the plan, not vibes — /map-check and /map-review validate against the spec, tests, and diff instead of asking whether code "looks fine".
• Clean-room review — /map-review auto-bundles spec, plan, tests, verification, and coverage evidence into a single durable input (.map/<branch>/review-bundle.json); --detached opens a read-only worktree for inspection without touching your branch.
• Project memory — /map-learn turns hard-won fixes and gotchas into reusable context, so the next session doesn't relearn them.

More under the hood (calibrated effort, mutation boundaries, token budgets, retry quarantine, run-health diagnostics, skill IR audit)

• Calibrated workflow effort — each shipped slash skill declares a thinking_policy and parallel_tool_policy, so lightweight commands stay direct while planning, review, and release workflows reserve deeper reasoning and parallel fan-out for the stages that benefit. Non-release prompts use targeted guardrails instead of blanket all-caps prohibition blocks, reducing over-triggered agents and tool calls while keeping true hard stops explicit.
• Mutation boundary constraints — write-capable Claude and Codex surfaces tell agents not to edit unrelated files, add or upgrade dependencies, or refactor neighboring code unless the current subtask requires it. Broader scope is reported as a blocker or tradeoff instead of silently expanding the diff.
• Context-first prompt envelopes — high-context /map-plan, /map-efficient, /map-debug, and /map-review prompts wrap branch artifacts in XML-style <documents>, then state the <task> and <expected_output>, so specs, diffs, logs, and schemas stay separated for the model.
• Contract-sized subtasks — blueprints require expected_diff_size, concern_type, one_logical_step, hard_constraints, soft_constraints, and coverage_map. Hard constraints must be owned in coverage_map and cited in the owning subtask; soft constraints can be traded off only with explicit tradeoff_rationale.
• Token budget report — Actor and review prompt builders append active-path budget decisions to .map/<branch>/token_budget.json (before/after estimated tokens, clipped sections, source artifacts). The operator breadcrumb for diagnosing missing context.
• Clean retry quarantine — after repeated Monitor rejection, write-capable workflows switch the next attempt into clean-retry mode using .map/<branch>/retry_quarantine.json (constraints, required evidence, do-not-repeat feedback) instead of raw failed-session context.
• Run health report — workflows write .map/<branch>/run_health_report.json during closeout: terminal status, step progress, retry counters, artifact presence, hook-injection status. CI can fail inconsistent closeouts with python3 .map/scripts/map_step_runner.py validate_run_health_report.
• Compact recovery surface — /map-resume keeps the active recovery flow short and moves low-frequency notes to resume-reference.md, so recovery after /clear or context exhaustion gives the next checkpoint action without loading the whole appendix.
• Skill IR audit — release checks lower shipped Claude and Codex SKILL.md files into a typed SkillIR, verify content hashes, catch unsupported frontmatter, reject missing supporting-file links, and block injection-like instructions before mapify init copies surfaces into user repos.

How It Works

MAP orchestrates specialized roles through slash commands and skills:

TaskDecomposer -> breaks goals into subtasks
Actor          -> implements scoped tasks
Monitor        -> validates quality and blocks invalid output
Predictor      -> analyzes impact for risky changes
Learner        -> captures reusable project memory

For Claude Code, MAP slash surfaces live in .claude/skills/map-*/SKILL.md files created by mapify init. For Codex CLI, mapify init . --provider codex creates .agents/skills/, .codex/agents/, .codex/config.toml, hooks, and shared .map/scripts/.

MAP is inspired by the MAP cognitive architecture (Nature Communications, 2025), which reported a 74% improvement on planning tasks. The CLI turns that idea into a practical software-development workflow.

Architecture deep-dive ->

Options

Context-compression policy, Stack Overflow for Agents (SOFA), and other init flags

Context-compression policy (controls the /compact nudge; default never — opt-in):

mapify init . --compression never                 # default — no nudge
mapify init . --compression auto                  # nudge at threshold
mapify init . --compression aggressive            # nudge at 0.4 x threshold
mapify init . --compression-threshold 250000      # Opus 1M / 50+ subtask plans

Actor and reviewer prompts always carry the full bundled context — context-block truncation was removed. If the conversation grows beyond your model's window, opt into /compact via --compression auto or trigger it manually. See docs/USAGE.md#context-budget-policy.

Stack Overflow for Agents (SOFA) read-only prior-art search — off by default, no network or credentials unless you enable it:

mapify init . --sofa            # opt-in: enable the map-so-search skill

This writes sofa.enabled: true to .map/config.yaml and adds .sofa/ to your .gitignore. Without the flag, no SOFA code path runs. See the SOFA usage guide.

Documentation

Guide	Description
Installation	All install methods, PATH setup, troubleshooting
Usage Guide	Workflows, examples, cost optimization, playbook
Architecture	Agents, MCP integration, customization
Platform Spec	Platform refactor roadmap, codebase analysis

Trouble?

• Command not found -> Run mapify init in your project first.
• Agent errors -> Check .claude/agents/ has all shipped agent .md files, or run mapify doctor.
• Poor output on a complex task -> Start with /map-plan and feed /map-efficient the approved plan instead of asking it to infer the architecture.
• More help ->

Contributing

Improvements welcome: prompts for specific languages, new agents, provider integrations, and CI/CD workflow support.

License

MIT

---

Start with /map-plan. Keep the model inside your engineering process, not the other way around.