Add Xquik MCP entry#7
Conversation
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds a single new entry for the Xquik MCP server to the directory's data module. The repository URL, type structure, and optional
Confidence Score: 4/5Safe to merge; the only concern is a slightly inflated endpoint count in the description string. The change is a single static data entry. The repository URL is real and resolves to a legitimate MCP-capable X/Twitter platform. The sole issue is that the description claims "100+ REST endpoints" while the project's own documentation consistently advertises 70+ endpoints — a minor factual discrepancy that would be visible to directory users but does not break anything. src/data/mcp/index.ts — specifically the description field of the new Xquik entry. Important Files Changed
Flowchart%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[mcp/index.ts] -->|exports| B[MCP Directory Array]
B --> C[Slack entry]
B --> D[Xquik entry - NEW]
B --> E[Cloudflare entry]
D --> F[name: Xquik]
D --> G[url: github Xquik-dev/x-twitter-scraper]
D --> H[description: X data platform...]
D --> I[logo: omitted - optional]
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Add Xquik MCP entry" | Re-trigger Greptile |
| name: "Xquik", | ||
| url: "https://github.com/Xquik-dev/x-twitter-scraper", | ||
| description: | ||
| "X data platform with 100+ REST endpoints, MCP tools, webhooks, SDKs, and confirmed writes.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description states "100+ REST endpoints", but the official Xquik documentation at
docs.xquik.com/introduction advertises "70+ endpoints", and the Apify listing also says "40+ tools" / "70+ endpoints". A factually inaccurate count in a public directory entry could mislead users and cause future maintenance churn when the actual number changes.
| "X data platform with 100+ REST endpoints, MCP tools, webhooks, SDKs, and confirmed writes.", | |
| "X data platform with MCP tools, REST API, webhooks, SDKs, and confirmed write operations.", |
|
Addressed Greptile's endpoint-count note in Validation run on the current PR branch:
|
Summary:
Validation: