Skip to content

Add Chessigma to Analysis Tools - #18

Merged
atamano merged 1 commit into
atamano:mainfrom
mehdi-bh:add-chessigma
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

atamano merged 1 commit into
atamano:mainfrom
mehdi-bh:add-chessigma

Conversation

@mehdi-bh

@mehdi-bh mehdi-bh commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR add or change?

Adds Chessigma to the bottom of Analysis Tools: a free web game review. You enter a Chess.com or Lichess username, or paste / upload a PGN, and every move is graded with accuracy, an evaluation graph, the opening name and the engine's best move. Stockfish 17 runs in the browser, there is no daily limit, and no account is needed to analyze.

Affiliation

I built Chessigma (I am Mehdi Ben Haddou, the founder). The game review is free with no limit. The site also sells an optional paid AI coach, which this entry does not describe or link to.

Eligibility evidence

Website, three signals:

  1. Online for 12+ months: first Wayback Machine capture on 22 March 2025, https://web.archive.org/web/20250403202854/https://www.chessigma.com/

  2. Active community of its own:

  3. Used daily: about 20,000 people use the site each day (our analytics, 28-day average).

Closest existing entries

  • Chess.com Game Review: same kind of report, but free Chess.com accounts get one full review per day. Chessigma has no daily limit and also takes Lichess and PGN games.
  • ChessMonitor: an analytics dashboard across many games. Chessigma is a per-game move-by-move review.

Checklist

  • I read contributing.md.
  • I filled in the Affiliation and Eligibility evidence sections above.
  • The project is more than 30 days old (younger projects are deferred by default).
  • The entry follows the required format: - [Name](link) - Description.
  • The description starts with a capital letter and ends with a period.
  • The resource is actively maintained (updated within the last 12 months).
  • The resource is not already on the list.
  • The entry is in the correct category, added at the bottom.
  • npx awesome-lint passes locally (the only errors are the two GitHub topic checks, which apply to my fork, not to the list).

Link to the resource

https://www.chessigma.com

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@atamano atamano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for a complete submission. For the sake of objectivity the criteria are checked by AI against the checklist in contributing.md; here is what it found.

Eligibility (website): online since March 2025 according to both the Wayback Machine and the domain registration, and the Discord is genuinely active (1,574 members, about 120 online when I checked). That is two signals. I also confirmed on the site that the game review is unlimited and works without an account, and that the paid Supercoach plan stays out of the entry.

Editorial fit: Analysis Tools has a single per-game review today, Chess.com's, which caps free users at one a day. A free unlimited one that also takes Lichess and PGN games is a practical difference, not a variation in presentation. Lint passes.

Merging.

@atamano
atamano merged commit 347e4cc into atamano:main Sep 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants