KAFKA-18053 Clean up topology config

[sebastienviale]

Pull request to implement KIP-1138, which aims to address several issues related to the configuration application process in Kafka Streams.

This PR has multiple goals:

• Deprecate TopologyConfig in favor of StreamsConfig.

• Deprecate StreamsBuilder#build(StreamsConfig) and encourage users to pass configurations via the StreamsBuilder constructor instead.

• Deprecate constructors in StreamsBuilder and Topology that accept a TopologyConfig, replacing them with constructors that accept a Properties or Map.

• Improve misconfiguration detection by:

  • Throwing an exception if a topology-specific config is set in StreamsConfig but not applied to the topology.
  • Logging a warning if a topology-specific config is set in both places but has different values.

[mjsax]

KIP is still under discussion: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1138%3A+Clean+up+TopologyConfig+and+API+for+supplying+configs+needed+by+the+topology

[sebastienviale]

KIP is still under discussion: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1138%3A+Clean+up+TopologyConfig+and+API+for+supplying+configs+needed+by+the+topology

@mjsax The KIP is voted since june: https://lists.apache.org/[email protected]:2025-6:KIP-1138
Do I have to update the status ?

[mjsax]

Ah. Never mind than. -- Please update the status to "accepted" :) Thanks.

[github-actions]

This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in 90 days. If you
would like to keep this PR alive, please leave a comment asking for a review. If the PR has
merge conflicts, update it with the latest from the base branch.

If you are having difficulty finding a reviewer, please reach out on the [mailing list](https://kafka.apache.org/contact).

If this PR is no longer valid or desired, please feel free to close it. If no activity occurs in the next 30 days, it will be automatically closed.

[github-actions]

This PR has been closed since it has not had any activity in 120 days. If you feel like this
was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open the
PR and ask for a review.

[github-actions]

A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the
attention of the committers. Once this issue has been triaged, the triage label
should be removed to prevent this automation from happening again.