feat: add embodied action receipt fixtures#36
Open
carloshvp wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
🟡 Contributor Check: MEDIUM
Automated check by AgenTrust Contributor Check. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a small fixture-style embodied-action receipt example for offline verification of externally consequential action evidence.
This complements:
cmcp#339Embodied Action Evidence Profiletrace-spec#66verification.action_receiptsaxisWhat changed
embodied-action-receipts/with deterministic JSON fixtures for:verify_receipts.py, an offline verifier that checks:action_refcall_id/ TRACE session bindingrejectedoutcomesgenerate_fixtures.pyfor reproducible fixture generation from a deterministic public test seed.Why
For embodied AI,
verification.action_receipts: requiredshould mean action-level receipt evidence is offline-verifiable and bound to the session/call. It should not imply physical completion, controller safety, or functional-safety certification.The
controller-rejectedfixture makes that boundary concrete: a signed rejection is valid evidence, but it is not proof that the physical action completed.Validation
python3 -m unittest discover -s embodied-action-receipts/tests -vpython3 embodied-action-receipts/verify_receipts.py embodied-action-receipts/fixtures/valid-chain.jsonpython3 embodied-action-receipts/verify_receipts.py embodied-action-receipts/fixtures/controller-rejected.jsonpython3 -m json.toolover all JSON filespyyamlgit diff --check