Skip to content

Conversation

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon commented Jun 24, 2025

Related #216

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new API endpoint to retrieve a list of available bulk import operations.
    • Added documentation for the new endpoint, including details on the response format and schema.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to verify the new endpoint returns the correct status and response data.

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GET API endpoint /api/v1/bulk-import was introduced, which returns a list of bulk import operations. Supporting changes include the implementation and export of a getAllBulkImportOperations function, updates to the API documentation to describe the new endpoint and its response schema, and the addition of corresponding tests to verify the endpoint's behavior.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/importers/index.js Added getAllBulkImportOperations function and exported it.
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js Added GET /bulk-import endpoint using getAllBulkImportOperations.
src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml Documented new /api/v1/bulk-import endpoint and defined Operation schema.
tests/httpServer/apiV1.test.js Added test for GET /api/v1/bulk-import endpoint, checking response status and body; added TODO for 500 error test.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API_Router
    participant Importers

    Client->>API_Router: GET /api/v1/bulk-import
    API_Router->>Importers: getAllBulkImportOperations()
    Importers-->>API_Router: [Operation, ...]
    API_Router-->>Client: 200 OK, JSON [Operation, ...]
Loading

Poem

A new route hops into view,
Bulk imports, now clear and true.
Schema and ID, all in a row,
The docs and tests both proudly show.
With every GET, the data springs—
Oh, what joy new endpoints bring!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 672704c and 1dd6c1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • __tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (2 hunks)
  • src/importers/index.js (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js
  • tests/httpServer/apiV1.test.js
  • src/importers/index.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Playwright Tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: build
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)

228-231: Add error handling for consistency

While the current implementation works, it lacks error handling that other routes in this file implement. Consider adding a try-catch block for consistency.

  router.get('/bulk-import', async (req, res) => {
-    const operations = getAllBulkImportOperations()
-    res.json(operations)
+    try {
+      const operations = getAllBulkImportOperations()
+      res.json(operations)
+    } catch (error) {
+      logger.error(error)
+      res.status(500).json({ errors: [{ message: 'Failed to retrieve bulk import operations' }] })
+    }
  })
__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (1)

549-557: Consider adding error scenario tests

The happy path test is well-implemented and follows the established pattern. However, consider adding a test for error scenarios to match the pattern of other endpoints in this file.

  describe('GET /api/v1/bulk-import', () => {
    test('should return 200 and a list of bulk import operations', async () => {
      const response = await app.get('/api/v1/bulk-import')
      const operations = getAllBulkImportOperations()

      expect(response.status).toBe(200)
      expect(response.body).toStrictEqual(operations)
    })
+
+    test.todo('should return 500 for internal server error')
  })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 350a149 and 672704c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • __tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (2 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (1 hunks)
  • src/importers/index.js (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)
src/importers/index.js (1)
  • getAllBulkImportOperations (97-105)
src/importers/index.js (3)
src/cli/workflows.js (4)
  • require (4-4)
  • require (5-5)
  • require (6-6)
  • require (7-7)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (5)
  • require (2-2)
  • require (3-3)
  • require (5-5)
  • require (6-6)
  • require (7-7)
src/schemas/index.js (1)
  • bulkImportSchema (7-7)
__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (2)
src/importers/index.js (6)
  • require (1-1)
  • require (2-2)
  • require (3-3)
  • require (4-4)
  • require (7-7)
  • getAllBulkImportOperations (97-105)
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (5)
  • require (2-2)
  • require (3-3)
  • require (5-5)
  • require (6-6)
  • require (7-7)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/importers/index.js (3)

7-7: LGTM - Clean import addition

The import statement properly follows the existing pattern and imports the required schema for the new functionality.


97-105: Well-structured function implementation

The function correctly returns the expected data structure for bulk import operations. The hardcoded operation matches the API specification and test expectations.


108-109: Proper module export update

The export statement correctly includes both existing and new functions, maintaining backward compatibility.

src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)

7-7: LGTM - Consistent import pattern

The import follows the established pattern in the file and correctly destructures the needed function.

__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (1)

32-32: LGTM - Proper test import

The import correctly brings in the function needed for test verification, following the established pattern in the test file.

src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (2)

368-389: Well-documented API endpoint

The endpoint documentation follows OpenAPI 3.0 standards and is consistent with other endpoints in the file. The response definitions properly cover both success and error scenarios.


392-408: Comprehensive Operation schema definition

The schema definition is well-structured with:

  • Clear property definitions
  • Appropriate examples that match the implementation
  • Strict validation with additionalProperties: false
  • All required fields properly marked

This aligns perfectly with the data structure returned by getAllBulkImportOperations().

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon merged commit a1755c5 into main Jun 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon deleted the ulises/bulk-import branch June 24, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants