docs(LLM provider): Add usage tracking Note to OpenHands provider page

[enyst]

This PR adds a Note to the OpenHands LLM provider documentation clarifying minimal usage tracking:

• Inserted immediately after the API key instructions image and before the models table, as requested
• Explains that when using OpenHands as a provider, minimal usage tracking is performed to understand whether models are used for the agent, condenser, or other uses
• States that this data is sent to All Hands AI to improve the OpenHands experience and that we never sell this data

File changed:

• openhands/usage/llms/openhands-llms.mdx

Let me know if you'd like the Note positioned elsewhere or reworded.

@enyst can click here to continue refining the PR

[neubig]

In a previous comment I requested that this include a link to our privacy policy, instead of posting specifically about what it is or is not used for, since that may get out of sync. I think we should do that before changing the wording here: https://openhands.dev/privacy

[enyst]

In a previous comment I requested that this include a link to our privacy policy, instead of posting specifically about what it is or is not used for, since that may get out of sync. I think we should do that before changing the wording here: https://openhands.dev/privacy

Done! WDYT, does this work?

[enyst]

In a previous comment I requested that this include a link to our privacy policy, instead of posting specifically about what it is or is not used for, since that may get out of sync. I think we should do that before changing the wording here: https://openhands.dev/privacy

FWIW I do see the concern that it’d get out of sync. But I’m not sure it’s the best way to express it to people.

The attempt in this PR is to say in plain English what happens, so that people know and it doesn’t come as a surprise. Maybe we should add what data is collected here, because if people don’t know it’s just ‘agent’ or ‘condenser’, and they find out later that OpenHands tracks their usage, they may fear the worst.

FWIW, I’ve seen at times something like, on some company site: “Tos in English” << with a plain English short explanation of what’s up, and then a link to the full legalese. I’m not good with words, to convey it, if you could imagine the Tos in English, it was fun, it had a lightweight tone and told people what’s happening and why. Maybe it’s worth thinking of this PR as the small version of that?

(It’s not like AH is going to sell this kind of data, right? So couldn’t we just say it doesn’t?)

[neubig]

LGTM now! And yes, I think it makes a lot of sense for us to try to create a simpler version of the privacy policy as well.