feat(maintainers): richer per-repo roster UI#230
Conversation
Improve the By-repo expanded roster:
- carry each maintainer's GitHub association (owner/member/collaborator) through
the API and show it as a subtle role pill — useful 'who are they' context
- replace the per-row 'registered miner / not a registered miner' text (noisy
when a repo has many collaborators) with one legend line ('N / M registered
miners — split this repo's X% cut') plus the ✓ badge on registered rows
- de-emphasize non-registered maintainers (dimmed) so the reward-earning ones
stand out; show their reward as '—' instead of repeating the status
- larger avatars, cleaner two-column (identity / reward) layout
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 41 minutes and 32 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…lumns
The per-repo breakdown under an expanded maintainer was cramped and unlabeled
('191 / 30d · 11h', '191 total', '35% cut' in their own grid). Re-lay it out on
the parent table's GRID so each repo's Shipping / All-time / Grade / τ-day sit
directly under those headers and visibly sum to the maintainer's aggregate row.
Mode + cut move to a subtext line under the repo name, median response time
becomes the shipping subtext, redundant 'total/τ-d/cut' suffixes drop (the
header labels them), and a thin connector tick marks the sub-rows.
1 participant
Follow-up to #229. Improves the By repo expanded roster (the list of a repo's maintainers).
Before
Every maintainer row repeated "registered miner" / "not a registered miner" — noisy on repos with many collaborators (e.g.
we-promise/surehas 1 registered miner among 9 collaborators), and the list was flat.After
✓ N / M registered miners — split this repo's X% maintainer cut, with the ✓ badge on registered rows. Removes the repeated status text.—for reward, so the reward-earning miners stand out.API adds
associationtoRepoMaintainerEntry(no extra fetches — it was already in the mirror response, just dropped before).tsc+eslint --max-warnings=0clean.