Skip to content

Split build and test CI entry point from workflow to provide a reusable interface#144

Open
fbeutin-ledger wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fbe/reusable_entry_point_for_CI
Open

Split build and test CI entry point from workflow to provide a reusable interface#144
fbeutin-ledger wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fbe/reusable_entry_point_for_CI

Conversation

@fbeutin-ledger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.46%. Comparing base (9c2ea1c) to head (38f364e).
⚠️ Report is 146 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #144   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.46%   88.46%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines          78       78           
  Branches       20       20           
=======================================
  Hits           69       69           
  Misses          9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.46% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@fbeutin-ledger fbeutin-ledger force-pushed the fbe/reusable_entry_point_for_CI branch from a4db3ea to e68dfb1 Compare January 2, 2025 08:38
@fbeutin-ledger fbeutin-ledger force-pushed the fbe/reusable_entry_point_for_CI branch from e68dfb1 to 38f364e Compare January 2, 2025 09:00
Comment on lines 4 to 6
#
# The build part of this workflow is mandatory, this ensures that the app will be deployable in the Ledger App Store.
# While the test part of this workflow is optional, having functional testing on your application is mandatory and this workflow and

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering if we should move this part to the other workflow?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants