test: verify storage power cycles on full and Bitcoin-only products - #71
Draft
BitHighlander wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
test: verify storage power cycles on full and Bitcoin-only products#71BitHighlander wants to merge 1 commit into
BitHighlander wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The power-cycle suite assumed every emulator wrote a full-product storage stamp. Identify the product through its coin table, require the correct declared stamp, and verify Bitcoin-only firmware reads its own band without rewriting flash. Retain the full-product refusal-without-wipe check. Exact 7.14.3 Bitcoin-only and 7.15 full emulator runs each passed 14 tests with one inapplicable burned-version skip. The tests still verify PIN-protected wallet addresses across reboot and V16 migration.