Skip to content

Conversation

@Shravani2264
Copy link

@Shravani2264 Shravani2264 commented Nov 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced reliability of chat processing system with improved error handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 2, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds try/except error handling around an LLM API call in the chat module. On failure, the error is logged and re-raised. Success path behavior and prompt construction remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
LLM Error Handling
backend/app/modules/chat/llm_processing.py
Wraps LLM API request in try/except block; logs errors and re-raises exception on failure; info logging and response return path unchanged on success

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify error logging includes sufficient context (exception type, message, relevant request details)
  • Confirm exception re-raising preserves stack trace information
  • Check that success path behavior is truly unchanged and no unintended side effects introduced

Poem

A rabbit in code foresees the fall,
wraps API calls in safety's shawl—
try, catch, and log without dismay,
errors won't ruin the bunny's day! 🐰

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "fixed api call added try/except" accurately describes the main change in the changeset: adding error handling via try/except blocks to an LLM API call in the llm_processing.py module. While the phrasing is somewhat informal and could be grammatically polished, the title is specific enough that a teammate scanning the repository history would clearly understand the primary change—error handling was implemented for an API call. The title is directly related to the actual modifications and is not misleading or overly vague.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/app/modules/chat/llm_processing.py (1)

66-66: Consider catching more specific exceptions.

Catching the broad Exception type will intercept all errors, including unexpected ones like KeyboardInterrupt (though that's less likely in this context). If the Groq SDK provides specific exception types (e.g., groq.APIError, groq.RateLimitError), catching those would make the error handling more precise and allow different handling for different failure modes in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19c83ed and 90a3eb0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/app/modules/chat/llm_processing.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.2)
backend/app/modules/chat/llm_processing.py

67-67: Use logging.exception instead of logging.error

Replace with exception

(TRY400)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant