test: add integration tests for event processing order [WPB-24696]

[MohamadJaara]

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-24696

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

the Event repository is an important part of the app and and even tho it is covered with unit tests using mocks it does not tell the full story, so here is a bunch of integration tests to make sure the order or event processing is unchanged and always correct

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Test Results

0 tests   - 4 743   0 ✅  - 4 626   0s ⏱️ - 2m 52s
0 suites  -   782   0 💤  -   117 
0 files    -   782   0 ❌ ±    0 

Results for commit 0504497. ± Comparison against base commit 0dd9ca5.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.85%. Comparing base (0dd9ca5) to head (0504497).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4040      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    59.75%   59.85%   +0.09%     
===========================================
  Files         2030     2030              
  Lines        65703    65703              
  Branches      7178     7178              
===========================================
+ Hits         39263    39325      +62     
+ Misses       23216    23160      -56     
+ Partials      3224     3218       -6     

see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0dd9ca5...0504497. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	mo/test/add-integration-tests-for-Event-reository
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	932.53 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	587,826.67 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.inboxPagingDeepPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	133,544.70 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.inboxPagingFirstPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	126,928.87 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.localMarkAsReadBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	3,511.15 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.messagePagingDeepPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	26,490.95 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.messagePagingFirstPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	11,336.63 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,338,446.76 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,259.70 µs

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher