Describe the bug
Microsoft provides a .NET Standard compatible version of System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager which we have been using in .NET 10 successfully for many projects. Using the replacement from WebFormForCore creates an incompatibility where it throws an error when not recognizing standard sections, such as appSettings and connectionStrings.
(Moreover, it seems to require .NET framework libraries (webengine4.dll), so we are running into exceptions because that assembly is not available, but this is a separate bug. One that could be solved if this assembly were just not used)
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Attempt to read in app.config with an section
- See error
Expected behavior
Compatibility with original ConfigurationManager that understood appSettings, connectionStrings (and probably more). OR the ability to use the official System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager
Describe the bug
Microsoft provides a .NET Standard compatible version of System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager which we have been using in .NET 10 successfully for many projects. Using the replacement from WebFormForCore creates an incompatibility where it throws an error when not recognizing standard sections, such as appSettings and connectionStrings.
(Moreover, it seems to require .NET framework libraries (webengine4.dll), so we are running into exceptions because that assembly is not available, but this is a separate bug. One that could be solved if this assembly were just not used)
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Compatibility with original ConfigurationManager that understood appSettings, connectionStrings (and probably more). OR the ability to use the official System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager