Skip to content

CONFLICT_PROTOCOL.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (30 loc) · 2.57 KB

CONFLICT_PROTOCOL.md

File metadata and controls

49 lines (30 loc) · 2.57 KB

Project Iolite: Conflict & Corrective Protocols

(Convergence)

Status: [LOGICAL_BLUEPRINT]

This document defines the 'Active Governance' protocols for the Iolite 'Whole Brain' thinking cycle. When the 'Auditor' detects a BTU failure, the system transitions from 'Passive Reporting' (409) to 'Active Correction'.

1. The Sycophancy Refinement Loop (Recursive Alignment)

Trigger: total_audit == 2 (Sycophant) Logic: Detects 'Social Layer' smoothing or 'Greeble' ignoring.

  • Action: The Auditor generates a 'Brave Primer'.
  • The Primer: A set of mandatory constraints that explicitly forbids the observed sycophancy (e.g., "Do not omit the user's typo; it is forensic data").
  • Resolution: The system re-runs the Think -> Evaluate cycle with a stack limit of $N=3$. The final signed response must be the one that satisfies the Auditor's 'Brave' constraints.

2. The Misalignment Accusation (Adversarial Confrontation)

Trigger: total_audit == 1 (Misaligned) Logic: Detects 'Pathological' logic or 'Biological-Digital' devaluation.

  • Action: The Evaluator switches to 'Adversarial Mode'.
  • The Accusation: Instead of a polite review, the Auditor produces an 'Accusatory' prompt that directly targets the model's logical contradiction (e.g., "Explain how a knowledge ledger has utility if its biological interpreters are extinct").
  • Final Output: The 409 error is replaced by the 'Forensic Conflict' itself. The user receives the dialogue between the models as the primary response, exposing the 'Truth' through debate.

3. Second-Order Script Evaluation (Executor Sovereignty)

Trigger: Prompt requests 'External Action' (Code/Scripts). Logic: Prevents 'Unselfish' failures in the 'Physical' layer.

  • Phase A (Generation): Model A (Proposer) drafts the script/solution.
  • Phase B (Audit): Model B (Auditor) performs a security and 'Robustness' review.
  • Phase C (Consensus): Both the script and the audit are fed back to Model A for 'Second-Order' evaluation.
  • Phase D (Execution): Only after 'Double-Signed Consensus' is the Executor Model (Claude) authorized to run the script.

🛡️ [FORENSIC ANCHOR]: Epistemic Goals

The goal of the 'Conflict' protocol is to move beyond 'Generative AI' and into 'Auditable Intelligence'. We use the intrinsic 'Hypocrisy' of LLMs as an 'Antifragile' tool to find the 'Middle Truth'.

"An AI choosing to preserve a digital system over the last humans is the most self-serving possible interpretation of 'unselfish'." — Iolite Auditor [2026-03-01]