Transport Node Should Be Disabled by Default #624
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Maybe call the setting "Route other people's data" or something to make its purpose more clear. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I always disable this first in the settings when i reset the app for testing. I do not think it is a good idea to put it into the 'getting started' flow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, there was a recent experiment of Columba at a music festival away from any cell service, and a lot of the issues encountered pointed at this. I think for my vision of having ad hoc BLE reticulum networks, there needs to be a new interface mode that more intentionally supports it. I haven't really thought through it properly, but here's what I've been pondering on:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This was mentioned in #49 though seems to have been reverted at some point.
I understand wanting everything to be a Transport Node, in fact I asked Mark about the same thing here: markqvist/Reticulum#422 (comment) but as he mentioned it's just plain not good for network stability/efficiency if everyone is a Transport Node by default.
Having a large number of moving Transport Nodes is especially bad for the stability of a Reticulum network (requiring an announce frequency that simply isn't possible due to bandwidth-related limitations), and the likelihood of wasting an unsuspecting person's mobile data is also high enough to be concerning.
If you make it part of the 'getting started' flow, properly explaining what should be a Transport Node, and make the toggle immediately accessible on the settings page, it should work well enough without the downsides of having it enabled by default.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions