Project to be claimed
chonk: https://pypi.org/project/chonk
Your PyPI username
ken_stott: https://pypi.org/user/ken_stott
Reasons for the request
The project appears to be registered but has never published a file.
https://pypi.org/simple/chonk/ returns a valid PEP 503 index page containing
zero links (pypi:project-status = active, serial 28910253), and
https://pypi.org/pypi/chonk/json returns 404 — the signature of a name that
was reserved without any release ever being uploaded.
An upload attempt on 2026-08-13 was rejected with:
403 The user 'ken_stott' isn't allowed to upload to project 'chonk'.
I maintain an actively developed open-source library named chonk
(https://github.com/kenstott/chonk) — a retrieval/RAG pipeline for chunking,
embedding, NER, and vector search. Because the name is unavailable I have
published it as chonk-rag (https://pypi.org/project/chonk-rag/), keeping
chonk as the import name. I would like to consolidate under the natural
distribution name if the existing registration is indeed dormant.
I am not asking for the name to be taken from anyone actively using it. If the
current owner has plans for it, or responds and wants to keep it, I am content
to stay on chonk-rag.
Maintenance or replacement?
Replacement
Source code repositories URLs
Contact and additional research
Research performed:
https://pypi.org/simple/chonk/ → HTTP 200, valid index, 0 files.
https://pypi.org/pypi/chonk/json → HTTP 404 (consistent with no releases).
- Upload to the project → 403, quoted above.
Contact attempts: none yet, and I want to be transparent about why. A project
with no releases publishes no author or maintainer email in any distribution
metadata, and the project page at https://pypi.org/project/chonk/ is not
readable programmatically (the request is served a bot challenge), so I have not
been able to identify the owner or any contact route from public data. I am
happy to attempt direct contact if a moderator can point me at the owner, and I
understand from the template that moderators contact owners independently.
I appreciate that PEP 541 requests take time and are decided at moderator
discretion. There is no urgency on my side — chonk-rag is published and
working.
Project to be claimed
chonk: https://pypi.org/project/chonkYour PyPI username
ken_stott: https://pypi.org/user/ken_stottReasons for the request
The project appears to be registered but has never published a file.
https://pypi.org/simple/chonk/returns a valid PEP 503 index page containingzero links (
pypi:project-status=active, serial 28910253), andhttps://pypi.org/pypi/chonk/jsonreturns 404 — the signature of a name thatwas reserved without any release ever being uploaded.
An upload attempt on 2026-08-13 was rejected with:
I maintain an actively developed open-source library named chonk
(https://github.com/kenstott/chonk) — a retrieval/RAG pipeline for chunking,
embedding, NER, and vector search. Because the name is unavailable I have
published it as
chonk-rag(https://pypi.org/project/chonk-rag/), keepingchonkas the import name. I would like to consolidate under the naturaldistribution name if the existing registration is indeed dormant.
I am not asking for the name to be taken from anyone actively using it. If the
current owner has plans for it, or responds and wants to keep it, I am content
to stay on
chonk-rag.Maintenance or replacement?
Replacement
Source code repositories URLs
description, no homepage, and no repository, since it has no releases and
therefore no distribution metadata.
https://pypi.org/project/chonk-rag/ (v0.2.4, MIT, ~1,300 tests).
Contact and additional research
Research performed:
https://pypi.org/simple/chonk/→ HTTP 200, valid index, 0 files.https://pypi.org/pypi/chonk/json→ HTTP 404 (consistent with no releases).Contact attempts: none yet, and I want to be transparent about why. A project
with no releases publishes no author or maintainer email in any distribution
metadata, and the project page at
https://pypi.org/project/chonk/is notreadable programmatically (the request is served a bot challenge), so I have not
been able to identify the owner or any contact route from public data. I am
happy to attempt direct contact if a moderator can point me at the owner, and I
understand from the template that moderators contact owners independently.
I appreciate that PEP 541 requests take time and are decided at moderator
discretion. There is no urgency on my side —
chonk-ragis published andworking.