Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
The |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Several of the objects use the
metadataproperty (product, user, license, machine, policy). The is great, but the downside is a write operation will overwrite all old values, so if one of the existing values is not included in the write operation, it will be deleted.Would be nice if an additional single
metadataObjectwas added as a sibling to the existingmeatadataobject. Where themetadataObjectis a free-form property we could store our own json or similar. In this way, we would always be retrieving a single object, deserializing, updating, then reserializing back.I can see how this feature could be abused by extremely large json files, so maybe a size cap would be needed as well.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions