You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 8, 2026. It is now read-only.
On line 373 and 374 of models.py, you have "if posterior_conv3 != None: modules.append(posterior_conv4)", which looks strongly like a bug based on the surrounding context. I might be mistaken since I have only started to look at the source, but I wanted to make you aware in case it is a bug. The context of these lines is below
361: def postup(updates, w):
362- modules = [up_conv1,up_conv2,down_conv1,down_conv2]
363- if downsample and downsample_type == 'conv':
364- modules += [up_conv3,down_conv3]
365- if prior_conv1 != None:
366- modules.append(prior_conv1)
367- if posterior_conv1 != None:
368- modules.append(posterior_conv1)
369- if posterior_conv2 != None:
370- modules.append(posterior_conv2)
371- if posterior_conv3 != None:
372- modules.append(posterior_conv3)
373- if posterior_conv3 != None:
374- modules.append(posterior_conv4)
375- for m in modules:
376- updates = m.postup(updates, w)
On line 373 and 374 of models.py, you have "if posterior_conv3 != None: modules.append(posterior_conv4)", which looks strongly like a bug based on the surrounding context. I might be mistaken since I have only started to look at the source, but I wanted to make you aware in case it is a bug. The context of these lines is below