Erasure-Code-擦除码-3-极限篇 - OpenACID Blog #32
giscus[bot]
bot
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
|
这三篇关于 EC 的原理,讲的太棒了! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
˙∆˙谢谢喜欢 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
对于小io覆盖写在ec中使用，大佬有什么建议吗 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
ec对小io不友好, 想办法攒一堆批量写会好点. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
感谢(: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
还想请问一下，开源代码有小io聚合类似的实现吗 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
"这里p是单块数据丢失的风险,一般选择磁盘的日损坏率: 大约是0.0001. p一般很小所以近似数据丢失风险就只看第1项:" 看这个表达式，如果m不变，似乎K越大，风险值越小？是近似导致的吗 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
k越大风险越大啊 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Erasure-Code-擦除码-3-极限篇 - OpenACID Blog
没有人比我更懂EC(特辣脯口气): 从指令集和算法两个方向对擦除码实现深度优化, 硬核但不烧脑
https://blog.openacid.com/storage/ec-3/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions