Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
I am also interested in this. Since the question was posted, it looks like the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Support for OpenSSL 1.1 was removed and the option values were renamed. These are 2 options now:
#5210 issue is about being able to compile against and run with system installed OpenSSL 3.5 without the need for a submodule or static linking. But it's not yet properly resolved. If you want to build the "old" way, use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is it currently possible to build
msquicwith a manually installed version of OpenSSL 3.x ?I'm compiling and installing
OpenSSL3.5.0 from source on Debian Bookworm.I do this to ensure full control over the
OpenSSLversion used, and to avoid rebuilding it across multiple dependencies.Even though I'm using the following CMake options:
msquicstill attempts to build its internalOpenSSLsubmodule.Here's how I configure msquic:
And here's the error I get during build:
It seems like the CMake logic still requires the internal
submodules/openssl3, even when usingQUIC_USE_SYSTEM_LIBCRYPTO=ON.EDIT: I just saw issue #4019, is the incompatibility still relevant?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions