I tested your last build and SFP+ is not working, though im-0 build is.
Please consider applying full im-0 patch (from branch im-bpi-r4-patches-v24.10.0-git) to fix tx power, SFP+ and more:
|
## https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/pull/968 |
|
#- name: Use patch from im-0 |
|
# run: | |
|
# mkdir -p package/kernel/mt76/patches |
|
# curl -SL https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/commit/aaf90b24fde77a38ee9f0a60d7097ded6a94ad1f.patch > package/kernel/mt76/patches/001-use-tx_power-from-default-fw-if-EEPROM-contains-0s-im-0.patch |
|
# |
# https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/pull/968 -> https://github.com/im-0/openwrt/tree/im-bpi-r4-patches-v24.10.0-git
- name: Use patch from im-0
run: |
curl -sL https://github.com/im-0/openwrt/compare/ef287cd%5E..14dcfb9.patch |
patch -p1
Maybe it'll require adjustment to apply to kernel 6.12 because it's originally for 6.6...
P.S.: You know you could use the suffix .patch to compare and pull requests too, e.g.: https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/pull/968.patch
I tested your last build and SFP+ is not working, though im-0 build is.
Please consider applying full im-0 patch (from branch im-bpi-r4-patches-v24.10.0-git) to fix tx power, SFP+ and more:
openwrt-builder/.github/workflows/bpi-r4-main_router.yaml
Lines 104 to 109 in 7ab228a
Maybe it'll require adjustment to apply to kernel 6.12 because it's originally for 6.6...
P.S.: You know you could use the suffix
.patchto compare and pull requests too, e.g.: https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/pull/968.patch