Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 22, 2026. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on May 22, 2026. It is now read-only.

How do you "Enhance Threat Detection" without disclosing the threat first.... ? #783

Description

@Str8tdr0p

CISA Kills A16+A17 Unblown Fuse Disclosure AFTER 4 Weeks Analysis With Zero Technical Rebuttal

VINCE Confirmation + CVE 2026-25251 Already Reserved

COMPLETE FORENSIC ZIP ATTACHED (livetracev3 + parsers + reports): 02.08_CVE-2026-25251_Exploitation

  • 9x 0x2081 unfused enable kernel access → 11x iCloud C2
  • Offset correlation: 0x000100(debug)→0x01e04d(gateway.icloud.com)
  • i2c BMS access confirmed

Active Exploitation

No technical rebuttal, no transparent communication, no reason to close this case. All evidence provided was produced from a production, consumer-used device


These types of risks go beyond quantification


Timeline

1. Jan 28: VINCE analyst ACKNOWLEDGES vuln → "Active exploitation → TI BMS"

Image

2. Feb 3: TI "Doesn't match SN27xxx" + "Not Apple API experts"

TI literally admits lacking Apple expertise yet CISA defers to them.

Image

3. Feb 24: Derek Vranes CLOSES despite 4 weeks review: "Private vendor calls = no CVE"

Image

CVE-2026-25251 reserved, MITRE publication refused.

Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    Status
    🆕 Product Backlog

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions