Composition: independent recomputable verdicts alongside SATI's commit-before-feedback reputation

[babyblueviper1]

Really like the design here — especially proof of participation (the agent signs a commitment before knowing the score). That commit-before-outcome shape is the same tamper-evidence primitive a lot of us are converging on, which is exactly why I wanted to float a composition rather than anything that overlaps.

Where SATI is strong: on-chain identity + a complete, blind feedback history on Solana. The one thing reputation-as-a-stored-score (the 0–100 average) can't give a skeptic who wasn't there is recomputation — they still have to trust that the average reflects real interactions. A complementary layer: alongside a feedback attestation, optionally carry a pointer to an independent, recomputable verdict on the interaction — a third party's judgment ("was this output sound / compliant?") published as a signed artifact anyone can re-verify from public data (schnorr vs a published key), committed before the outcome so it can't be back-dated. Not a score you trust — a verdict you re-derive.

Concretely this composes, it doesn't compete:

• SATI keeps identity + the blind feedback record (the what happened).
• A feedback attestation optionally references an independent JudgmentExecutionAttestation (ERC-8004 / the ERC-8299 "WYRIWE" judgment-attestation shape) — committed before the outcome, recomputable after.
• Net: "reviewer gave 85" becomes "reviewer gave 85, and here's an independent recomputable verdict on the same interaction."

Since SATI is already ERC-8004 (on Solana), this references the same standard rather than forking it. I help maintain a production reference impl of the judgment/recompute side (recomputable proofs, losses published too) and would be glad to co-define the field-level seam if it's interesting — or just compare notes on the commit-before-outcome alignment, which is uncanny. Totally fine if it's out of scope.