Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi Joe,

Thanks again for taking the time to write this up and dig into the behavior.

After looking through the mapper logic more carefully, I don’t think I want to add this as a separate feature right now. The main reason is that WatchState already has several layers of conditional state handling: stale-date checks, tainted events, metadata-only imports, mark-unplayed protection, force-full imports, webhook handling, and per-backend options. Adding another rule here would complicate an already delicate part of the state engine for what now looks like limited gain.

The behavior you’re describing is mostly already covered during normal incremental syncs. When WatchState has a valid import.l…

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by arabcoders
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants