Skip to content

Matched advisory candidates (shard 27) - #1668

Merged
p-linnane merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
matched-advisories-27
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

p-linnane merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
matched-advisories-27

Conversation

@BrewTestBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated candidates via brew advisory-match --formula-list (planned workers) --new-history, sharded by formula (SHA-256 bucket 27). See CONTRIBUTING.md for the review checklist.

Partial daily run: successful buckets only; the older standing PR may overlap.

Run and review artifacts: https://github.com/Homebrew/advisory-database/actions/runs/40562423753

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5f213f and 6ff5208.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • advisories/BREW-sceptre-CVE-2025-58367.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the advisory’s last-modified date.
    • Added links to a related security advisory and the project’s PyPI page. Existing package and release references remain unchanged. These updates provide readers with additional sources for reviewing information related to the advisory.

The Sceptre advisory’s modified timestamp changes. Two web references are added: one to PYSEC-2026-327 and one to DeepDiff on PyPI.

Changes: Sceptre advisory update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Advisory metadata and references
advisories/BREW-sceptre-CVE-2025-58367.json
The modified timestamp changes. The advisory adds a reference to PYSEC-2026-327 and a reference to DeepDiff on PyPI.

Priority: Low

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 6ff52

This metadata-only update is ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title "Matched advisory candidates (shard 27)" names the change accurately. The PR adds automated advisory candidates grouped by formula SHA-256 bucket 27. It is specific enough for a teammate to …
Description check Passed The description states that the PR contains automated matched advisory candidates from brew advisory-match, sharded by formula bucket 27. It also explains the partial run and possible overlap with an …
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title "Matched advisory candidates (shard 27)" names the change accurately. The PR adds automated advisory candidates grouped by formula SHA-256 bucket 27. It is specific enough for a teammate to identify the change, though it does not state the main content (a DeepDiff advisory update). The title is therefore related to the changeset and passes.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description states that the PR contains automated matched advisory candidates from brew advisory-match, sharded by formula bucket 27. It also explains the partial run and possible overlap with an older PR, and links to the review checklist and run artifacts. This is related to the changeset, so the check passes.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@p-linnane
p-linnane merged commit 5b5b781 into main Oct 27, 2026
7 checks passed
@p-linnane
p-linnane deleted the matched-advisories-27 branch October 27, 2026 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants