Normalised madness | the TOS section | Checks and balances

[6r1d]

This part of #13

I will do something else. I will ask you, if you honestly believe that a random document that nobody reads or /can/ read and provide an informed consent to, should be legally binding. Suppose the "terms of service" associated to that restaurant contained fine print instead of this being an unrelated document, should it then result in the right to have their rights be defended in court be diminished.

in context of the checks and balances, makes me remember our discussions of Filecoin.
Maybe ideal in terms of incentives is very hard to achieve, but at the very least, they made a dynamic system that can change and even change how it changes.