Skip to content

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #831

@zamazan4ik

Description

@zamazan4ik

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. E.g. PGO results for LLVM-related tooling are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis) - e.g. Clang gets +20% compilation speed with PGO, CPython achieves +10% in pybench. So I think optimizing daScript tooling with PGO would be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on the daScript tooling. If it shows improvements - add a note about possible improvements in daScript's performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the daScript tools according to their own workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built binaries with PGO

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (CPtyhon, Clang, and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions